It is currently Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:02 pm



Welcome
Welcome to <strong>Electromotive TEC Group!</strong>



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 79 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:24 pm 
Offline
one of us
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 8:26 pm
Posts: 58
Location: Gulf Coast Louisiana
TimZ wrote:

I downloaded it and tried to fire it up - comes up okay on my desktop, but my laptop craps out with an "Error 13 - type mismatch" on startup, apparently during data base initialization. I haven't had much of a chance to look into this, but would appreciate any suggestions - the only thing I found with a seach involved changing the international settings, which a) I don't think is my problem, being set for American English, and b) couldn't change anyway, since the program craps out too soon.



I get the exact same error on my desk top. Not willing to chance loading it on my lap top yet... :)

_________________
Click for Pictures
1974 Datsun Z car
rb26dett
Tec3r


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:15 am 
Offline
Newly Aquired

Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:21 pm
Posts: 42
Edited my earlier post on the conversion from WinTEC 3.5.6 to WinTEC 4.8.20.

Item 2 MAP/TPS acceleration enrichments - radio buttons changed, I reset them

Items 3.4.6 & 10 Found how to change row and colum tables, changed them back to where they were in 3.5.6.

Item 9 EGO / Wideband Calibration - Bin retains the earlier settings (they show on screen with values as before), but print out drops one voltage digit, screen has 3.

Item 12 Idle Control Sensitivity - Bin appears correct on screen but the print out reverses the values for Error Sensitivities (+ and - ).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:40 pm 
Offline
EMI
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 10:19 am
Posts: 371
Location: Manassas, VA
First let me say that there was a great deal of time and energy put into ensuring this conversion happened properly. Several people spent several days making and converting many files to be certain everything converted as it should.

This a quite a list. I double checked everything here and this is what I found:

JimK wrote:
Recieved my extra Tec3 from being upgraded for WinTEC 4 yesterday. Did a load of the 3.5.6 bin file and printed out. Did a side by side comparision of the 3.5.6 print out with the v4.8.20 print out and here is what it did not convert straight across:

(My tune was in as close to a factory new car driving tune as I would expect before the conversion, so don't argue my settings. The point is the conversion will not be a 1 for 1 conversion).


I'm not going to argue on this point other than to say this; The conversion IS more or less 1 to 1. The thing is that the MAP sensor is not read the same way it was before. To retain the PULSEWIDTH for a given MAP sensor voltage, modifications were needed to your TOG and IOT and subsequently every single pressure value in the existing program. This is why the table values are different, this is why the TOG and IOT are different. Look at the injector pulsewidth table under VE and compare that to the pulsewidth table under VE in WinTEC3. You will find that they are virtually identical.

JimK wrote:
Section 1: TOG was 8.55, now 7.314, IOG was -0.618, now 0.250. Selection of the # rows and columns now gone, that now puts a bunch of unwanted rows and columns in the tables, was using a 13 x 16 table. This many buckets must drive tuners crazy and run up the tuning bill to the customer.


You'd be surprised how rarely anyone is concerned by the table size. Richard Clewett had an issue with it. You'll note that unused rows and columns retain the same value as the last used row/column. This effectively cuts the table down to the size it previously was. There is not a way to make the table smaller than it is, other than this way. We don't tell our dealers how to bill. There are plenty of ways to 'run up the bill' other than blaming an over-large tuning table. As you can see, it's very easy to simply under-utilize the table as is.

JimK wrote:
Section 2: ACE0 was 54.50, now 12.00, ACE1 was 0.15, now 0.12. (The throttle enrichment now would be dumping fuell all the time, a waste) DCCL3 was 21, now 21.8. Battey compensation table new. MAT fuel enrichment 150C was 0, now 12. Warm up parameters all pushed one bucket to the right on the table (the converted array is bummed) i.e., -40C was 65, now 80, -30C was 50, now 65, -20C was 50, now 65, etc. Edit 6/24 - Also found the radio buttons to select the TPS or Map were not retained.


I checked on all of these. I'm not really sure how you got 54.5 into ACE0, the highest available setting is 52.5. Assuming that is what you really had, this is the same as turning the TPS rate of change value off. In fact, in WinTEC3.2.1 and 3.5.6, the TPS radio button is set to OFF when 52.5 is typed into ACE0. ACE1 changed because of the MAP sensor changes. I was not able to replicate the other problems listed here.

JimK wrote:
Section 3, 4, 5: Edit 6/24 - Tables all have oddball row scales, 22,31,42,53, etc. found that the scales can be reset, did so. Don't need and don't want a 16x16 table. Haven't yet seen where this is configurable (if it is at all possible).


See the notes above about the MAP sensor changes.

JimK wrote:
Section 6 ok

Sectoin 7 & 8 New


If sections 7 and 8 are new it's because WinTEC3 left them out of the printout. Those tables exist in WinTEC3 and as far as I can tell, convert properly.

JimK wrote:
Section 9: Number of cylinder events was 5 now 8. High MAP switch changed from 98 to 103.6kPa (no advice needed here, where it was set is what I want). EGO calibration table is new to the print out, so I need to compare on screen if it was converted as I had it, so it will correspond to the actual voltage output of the wideband) Edit 6/24 - found the on screen parameters have been retained, the print out drops one digit in each bucket.


I double checked these values and could not find any errors in the conversion here. The MAP sensor value is again changed due to the MAP sensor conversion.

JimK wrote:
Section 12: Idle control error sensitivity - was 150, now 175; error sensitivity + was 150, now 175 (swapped the values and look for sure like a conversion bug). Edit 6/24 - found the on screen values were retained, the print out reverses the values as indicated above.


This was actually a problem in the printout, I have fixed it for the next release.

JimK wrote:
Section 16: Thermo Fan control - Temp above ON was 92, now 96: temp blelow OFF was 92, now 48 (also seems like a conversion bug.)


Not really sure why you have this problem, it worked fine for me. Maybe you need to send me your BIN file so I can double check it?

_________________
Jon
Project Engineer
Electromotive, Inc
jon at emi.cc
www.distributorless.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:46 pm 
Offline
EMI
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 10:19 am
Posts: 371
Location: Manassas, VA
TimZ and rb26powered74zcar:

Clearly the issue is that pre-Nissan Z. :lol:

ON a more serious note, fully uninstall and reinstall the software and see if it runs any better. I haven't have anyone else report that problem to me. Problems during startup are typically caused by a problem during installation.

_________________
Jon
Project Engineer
Electromotive, Inc
jon at emi.cc
www.distributorless.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:51 pm 
Offline
founding member

Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 6:20 pm
Posts: 190
Location: Dearborn, Michigan
Jon@EMI wrote:
TimZ and rb26powered74zcar:

Clearly the issue is that pre-Nissan Z. :lol:

ON a more serious note, fully uninstall and reinstall the software and see if it runs any better. I haven't have anyone else report that problem to me. Problems during startup are typically caused by a problem during installation.


Didn't help. I did have a lot of "your version is newer" prompts during the install, and I always opted to keep the existing file. This included the msjet40 dll and the dao360 dll among several others - I'm guessing that these were probably updated with service pack 3. Any idea what service pack your developer's build machine was on for the OS and for VB? XP SP3 and VB6 SP6 here.

_________________
Image

Information is not knowledge
Knowledge is not wisdom
Wisdom is not truth
-FZ, Joe's Garage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:18 pm 
Offline
one of us
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 8:26 pm
Posts: 58
Location: Gulf Coast Louisiana
TimZ wrote:
Jon@EMI wrote:
TimZ and rb26powered74zcar:

Clearly the issue is that pre-Nissan Z. :lol:

ON a more serious note, fully uninstall and reinstall the software and see if it runs any better. I haven't have anyone else report that problem to me. Problems during startup are typically caused by a problem during installation.


Didn't help. I did have a lot of "your version is newer" prompts during the install, and I always opted to keep the existing file.



Exact same scenario here guys....

_________________
Click for Pictures
1974 Datsun Z car
rb26dett
Tec3r


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:19 am 
Offline
Stage 2
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 2:35 pm
Posts: 73
Location: UK
Jon,

What are the benefits/improvements for a TECgt user in upgrading to the latest firmware/software?

Edit: 1 further question. My understanding is that the firmware and software versions should match, the firmware version bundled with software v4.8.20 download is WTL0205009.em3 - is this the right firmware? I expected to see something along the lines of WTL0208yyy.em3

_________________
Steve.
Visit the home of the "slowMX5"


Last edited by slowMX5 on Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:48 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: WinTEC 3 to 4 Conversion notes
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:38 am 
Offline
Newly Aquired

Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:21 pm
Posts: 42
Jon,

Thanks for your detailed review of my notes and your concern is appreciated.

My notes and your review did accomplish a display of what others might see after converting and should settle concerns, it has mine.

I will do another conversion of the same bin file and fix only the fan settings (I need the old settings because the electric fan is the only forced cooling there is, albeit the Tec3 is a backup to a hard wired switch located at the bottom radiator tank) and the warm up enrichmens/coolant table (which moved every value up one temperature bucket in the table).

If the VE/timing advance tables function as you said with the upper colums blank, no change there because I don't need more than 13 columns. I will revert to my preferred row scale as all my analysis spreadsheets are on that basis and I don't think the row scale change to the old values will change my tune (ref your comments about the MAP) to any great extent as it is a NA engine.

I will take you up on your offer and email the bin that is the subject of my notes for you use. (I did try to program the Tec3 last evening and it fails to program with a runtime error 11 (I believe), divide by zero.

Thanks,
JimK


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:50 am 
Offline
EMI
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 10:19 am
Posts: 371
Location: Manassas, VA
When the "your version is newer" prompts come up, say No to All. I run XP SP1 on my developement machine, but I test installation on machines with SP2,3 and Vista. I have not had any problems with installation and operaion on any of those machines. Most problems stem from corruption or not replacing a database file required for WinTEC to operate. There was a work around added to the newer version that should have fixed that problem, but the results have been mixed. Allow all the files to be replaced and the software should work properly.

Benefits for TECgt:
Added a new Rev-limiter option: Revlimit approach retard, softens the landing at the revlimit
Fixed a problem with EGO correction when using blend
Improvements to Accerelation enrichments
Improvements to CAM syncing
A range of changes to WinTEC to improve usability but have no effect on the unit connected

_________________
Jon
Project Engineer
Electromotive, Inc
jon at emi.cc
www.distributorless.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:52 am 
Offline
Stage 2
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 2:35 pm
Posts: 73
Location: UK
Jon,

Thanks. I think I edited my post to include a question about the firmware version bundled with the download whilst you were writing this. Could you comment please?

_________________
Steve.
Visit the home of the "slowMX5"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 9:43 am 
Offline
founding member

Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 6:20 pm
Posts: 190
Location: Dearborn, Michigan
Quote:
When the "your version is newer" prompts come up, say No to All. I run XP SP1 on my developement machine, but I test installation on machines with SP2,3 and Vista. I have not had any problems with installation and operaion on any of those machines. Most problems stem from corruption or not replacing a database file required for WinTEC to operate. There was a work around added to the newer version that should have fixed that problem, but the results have been mixed. Allow all the files to be replaced and the software should work properly.


Yes, but what else will that break? I don't really like the notion of having to back-date several .dll's to SP1 level. At all.

_________________
Image

Information is not knowledge
Knowledge is not wisdom
Wisdom is not truth
-FZ, Joe's Garage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 10:06 am 
Offline
Stage 2
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 2:35 pm
Posts: 73
Location: UK
FWIW, and I know this is of no comfort to you, I have loaded v4.8.20 onto both a laptop and desktop running XP SP3 during the last 24 hours without any issues. I choose to keep the newer files on my machines during install.

_________________
Steve.
Visit the home of the "slowMX5"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 10:10 am 
Offline
founding member

Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 6:20 pm
Posts: 190
Location: Dearborn, Michigan
slowMX5 wrote:
FWIW, and I know this is of no comfort to you, I have loaded v4.8.20 onto both a laptop and desktop running XP SP3 during the last 24 hours without any issues. I choose to keep the newer files on my machines during install.


That's good information to know - thanks!

_________________
Image

Information is not knowledge
Knowledge is not wisdom
Wisdom is not truth
-FZ, Joe's Garage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:59 am 
Offline
Stage 2
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 2:35 pm
Posts: 73
Location: UK
Well I have just come up against a problem with uploading the new firmware (sort of brings me back to whether it is the correct version?). Tried 2 separate laptops, both found the TECgt, I then turned the TEC off and re-applied power to put it into upgrade mode (red light on). On trying to upload the new firmware both laptops just sat there doing nothing. Here's a snippet of the wintec log:
17:07:16 - Attempting Firmware Upgrade, Sending File...
17:07:16 - - C:\Program Files\WinTEC4\bin\WTL0205009.em3

That is as far as either laptop got. Progress bar just sat at 0%. Any ideas?

_________________
Steve.
Visit the home of the "slowMX5"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 9:15 pm 
Offline
EMI
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 10:19 am
Posts: 371
Location: Manassas, VA
The latest firmware version for each unit included with every installation of WinTEC is detailed in the release notes for that version.

SlowMX5:
I have had that happen before. When that happens, don't turn the unit off or disconnect anything, just go back and select firmware upgrade again. The cause is some weird timing glitch that I haven't been able to isolate (it doesn't happen too often). But every time it's happened to me, the process is successful the second time it's selected.

TimZ:
Because WinTEC4 is written in VB6, pretty much all of the DLLs are kind of old anyway. I have told numerous people to do exactly that and there have not been any ill effects. If it really bothers you, watch the file names and keep the DLLs and OCXs. If any files come up that are not, allow the older file to replace the newer one.

_________________
Jon
Project Engineer
Electromotive, Inc
jon at emi.cc
www.distributorless.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 79 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron